Skip to content

Posts from the ‘Medieval Weapons’ Category

Richard III – Indeed!

DNA indisputably identifies skeleton as that of Richard III

DNA analysis conducted by the geneticist Dr. Turi King at Leicester University has without doubt confirmed that the skeleton found at Greyfriars in August 2012 is indeed that of Richard III. This identification has been based on the identical mitochondrial DNA of two independent descendants of Anne of York, the sister of Richard III and the DNA extracted from the skeletal remains from Greyfriars.

These results were presented at a press conference earlier today in Leicester where other details were given about his manner of death.

Battle Wounds
It appears that the skeleton carried ten wounds, some perimortem and some probably postmortem wounds. Although it is not possible to decide without doubt which of these wounds were the fatal ones, at least two, which had been inflicted to the skull must have been deadly. One was a heavy blow probably inflicted by a halberd or the like at the back of his neck and cutting off a significant slive, while another was from a blade stuck into the brain.The researchers have speculated that the trauma to the head must have been the result of the loss at some point of the helmet of the king.

Several wounds were of a slighter character and done by daggers. The researchers have compared these to those found on individuals who were buried in a mass-grave at Towton in 1461. These individuals were found with skulls and skeletal remains, some of which were defaced post-mortem. It is generally believed this was done as part of a wilful defamation of the vanquished foe.

skull with injuries 300x199 Richard III – Indeed!

Man-handled Corpse
At the news conference the view was voiced that Richard III might have suffered the same treatment, since some of the wounds must have been inflicted after the body had been stripped of its armour.

This corresponds very well with a contemporary text, which says that after King Richards body had been discovered among the dead “many other insults were inflicted, the body was carried to Leicester in an inhuman way, a rope being placed around the neck” (Crowland Cronicle). Probably the head was tied to the rope which was strung between the feet and the hands of his body. Maybe a remnant of this fact may be discerned from the grave itself. Apparently the body of Richard III was interred with his hands still tied in front of him as opposed to the usual position of the arms and hands at that time, being laid parallel to the dead body.

On the other hand, although it is known that the body was slung naked over the back of a horse, one source tells us that it was ridden by his pursevant of arms, one Blanch Senglier or White-Boar. Thus there is no doubt that he was stripped at the battlefield; something which was done routinely by the victors and their accompanying throng of looters. Such stripping may very well have been done with the help of daggers, explaining the some of the smaller knife wounds inflicted on the body. The wounds, however, may not have been part of a willful defamation.

Further, the fact that he was not wrapped in a cloth or blanket while being carried from the battlefield may reflect nothing more than the need for the new king, Henry VII to exhibit his trophy thus avoiding any rumours that king Richard had succeeded in fleeing from the battle.

This also accounts for the fact that his dead body apparently was paraded for several days at Newark, the city hall, before being interred at Grayfriars. The body was presumably laid to rest unshrouded as it had not been pressed together as would have been the case had it been wrapped in a piece of textile. No personal objects of any kind were found in the grave.

Read about the scientific findings concerning the skeleton of Richard III at the dedicated website at Leicester University

The future
At the News conference a spokesman for the cathedral told what was decided several months ago that King Richard III will be reinterred at Leicester Cathedral some time early next year. At that time a proper exhibition is expected to be opened at a location near the former Greyfriars.

However already a smaller exhibition is announced to be opened at Leicester Cathedral on the 08.02.2013.

Tonight (04.02.2013)  the full story of the location of the grave, its excavation and the scientific study of the skeleton will be aired at Channel Four at 9PM. Here a facial reconstruction will be shown as well as a reconstructed film showing how Richard III may have walked due to his massive scoliosis.

Channel four – full story tonight 9PM.

Battle of Muret 1213

Battle of Muret 1213

Hardly have we survived the commemorations of the battle at Navas de Tolosa, before we have to focus on the battle of Muret in 1213.

The Battle of Muret took place in September 1213 when the crusading army of Simon IV de Montfort defeated the Catharist and Catalan Forces of Peter II of Aragon and those of his brother-in-law, Count Raymond. The battle began as siege of the Castle of Muret, but ended as an open battle. Today there is nothing left of the castle and Muret is nothing but a very unattractive suburb of Toulouse cut through by A64. However in the 13th century it was located on a promontory at the River Garonne, where fed by a tributary, the Saudrune.

The leader of crusaders, Simon de Montfort, had problems recruiting new crusaders. Nevertheless, beginning of September he collected his forces in order to relive the castle of Muret, which was under siege. In this he succeeded. At the same time the Count of Toulouse had placed his army on a hill and planned to dig himself in behind palisades and wagons. The king, however, wished for a pitched battle and marched in front of his 10.000 men attacking Simon de Montfort, who succeeded in outflanking the army and kill the king.

It is believed the smaller crusader army was victorious, because the two opposing war-lords could not agree on the best strategy.

Naturally a group of interested have for some time time worked in order to create an event, commemorating the battle. The plan is to reenact the battle. Programme for the festivities will be published at a dedicated website, www.Muret1213.org. There is also a facebook page for The Battle of Muret 

At the same time historians are planning an academic event in order to scrutinize the battle in its context. At a conference at Muret 13-15.09.2013 focus will be on the medieval city of Muret on the eve of the battle, the military technologies and warfare in the early 13th century, the princes and warlords engaged in the Albigensian Crusade, the culture, language and art in the region plus the historical aftermath of the battle.

Read about the conference: Le temps de la battaille de Muret (12 septembre 1213)

READ MORE:

The battles of Los Navas de Tolosa 1212 (and Muret 1213) were recently the topic of dedicated issue of Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies 2012.

 

A simple introduction to the Battle of Muret may be found here: La Bataille de Muret 1213

 

Crusader Sword

Rare medieval Crusader sword captured from Mamluk arsenal in Alexandria during last Crusade for sale at Bonhams in London…

A rare medieval sword taken from the Mamluk Arsenal at Alexandria during the last Crusade in the second half of the 14th Century is the top item in Bonhams sale of Antique Arms and Armor on November 28th in Knightsbridge. The sword is estimated to sell for £40,000 to £60,000.

This Italian-made sword was given as a gift to the Mamluk rulers of Alexandria by the Christian ruler of Cyprus and Jerusalem, King Peter I as part of a gift sealing a treaty. The sword was then forcibly taken back into Christian hands during the last Crusade’s victory over the city of Alexandria. Consequently the sword symbolizes the history of the time when Christians and Muslims fought for dominance in the eastern Mediterranean.

King Peter I, the King of Cyprus and Jerusalem, launched the last Crusade in 1362 against the Muslim Mamluk Empire in the region. A fleet set out from Cyprus and proved victorious, taking the city of Alexandria with immense amounts of plunder returned to Cyprus, including this sword. Such was the treasure and weapons taken from the captured city that many of the overloaded ships had to jettison cargo.

imperial crown vienna gryffindor wiki 300x200 Crusader Sword

Crusader Sword for sale at Bonham 2012

David Williams, Head of Bonhams Antique Arms and Armor Department, says: “The fascination of this sword is that it has survived some six centuries having been gifted by a Christian King to a Muslim ruler and kept in the famed Alexandrian armory and then taken by force by Crusaders and returned to Europe. It is a remarkable survivor of the Crusader period.”

The sword has a flat tapering double-edged blade 92.5 cm. long and overall with the hilt 115.7cm. The weapon bears an inscription that reads: ‘Hubs Khazain al-Silah bi thughri al-Iskandariyya ayyam al-Sayfi Faris al [...d.]‘, ‘Donation to the armory in the frontier city of Alexandria in the days of al-Sayfi Faris al- [Muhammadi]. Amir Faris was an inspector in 840H, corresponding to 1436-7 AD. Only three other swords appear to be recorded inscribed in the name of the Amir Faris. One in a private charitable foundation, another in Leeds Castle, Kent and the other in the Military Museum at Istanbul.

This historic sword was acquired by the late owner and arms collector, E.A. Christensen of Copenhagen, in exchange for a Swedish sword from Major John Lindgreen of Malmoe. Lindgreen had bought the sword at an unknown date from the dealer Lundgreen of Stockholm

The sword will go on sale on the 28th November in London, Knightsbridge. Other items from the collection of E.A. Christensen will be on sale as well, although most of this remarkable collection was absorbed into the National Museum in Copenhagen. Catalogue not available before

SOURCE:
Press Release: Rare medieval sword captured from Mamluk arsenal in Alexandria during last Crusade for sale at Bonhams in London

READ MORE:
Hoffmeyer, Ada Bruhn, Gammelt Jern: E. A. Christensens Våbensamling (Copenhagen: Våbenhistorisk Selskab, 1968. (Danish)

Read about the history of this sword at “The History Blog”